Search This Site

Spread Trader Pro

Michael Bigger is an investor and a trader who has been involved with trading technologies for more than twenty years. In 1992, Michael joined Citibank as head trader of U.S. single-stock derivatives, where he managed a $5 billion portfolio of equity derivatives. In 1998, he joined D.E. Shaw & Co., L.P. to trade the U.S. equity derivatives portfolio. (More)

Creative Flow

In Praise of Speculation

This form does not yet contain any fields.


    « How Is American Apparel Performing Against Original 2012 Guidance? | Main | American Apparel Wholesale Accelerating? »
    Monday
    May142012

    American Apparel Thesis Blossoming

    On May 6 2011, we wrote our initial post about American Apparel ($APP). It is hard to believe that we have worked on this situation for more than one year already. Investing in distressed situations requires a fair amount of patience. The process by which the original thesis is tested against actual results evolves over a few years time frame; the investment growing in size as the results back up the original thesis.

    We have been following every single move of the largest investor that invested capital in the company back in April of 2011. The big elephant in this deal was not Serruya but GCIC through its Dynamic Power Hedge Fund. GCIC has owned more than the 13-G filing requirement since the deal was executed. 

    GCIC owned 7,381,607 common shares (7.49% undiluted) as of June 30, 2011. In its latest 13G filing GCIC disclosed that it owned 20,005,216 common shares (18.38% undiluted) as of March 31, 2012.

    In April 2011, Michael Serruya, representing the investor group, had this to say about the original deal:

    "We believe in the American Apparel brand and we believe in Dov Charney," Mr. Serruya said. "We are convinced that with adequate resources, Dov and his experienced management team will lead American Apparel to new heights."

    The actions of GCIC indicate that it continues to believe in the original thesis, and that the company might very well elevate to new heights. The first quarter of 2012 results indicate that this is becoming a higher probability situation.

    Makes sense?

    Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits

    P.S. Don't go out and buy the stock. This is a highly distressed situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The purpose of the post is to write down how I think about this and share it with you.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>