Entries by Michael Bigger (152)

Thursday
Feb282013

Why I Added to My Groupon Position

I just added to my small Groupon position after Groupon announced that Andrew Mason has been removed from his CEO position (Letter to employees: ).

What I have learned since the vicious tech bear market of 2000 and 2001 is that buying leading Internet brands when they fall hard on their behinds has worked very well for me. I have made a lot of money with Amazon (AMZN), Priceline(PCLN), eBay(EBAY), Netflix ($NFLX), and Expedia (EXPE).

The buzz surrounding Groupon today sounds similar to the Amazon.Bomb ... Amazon.Con discussions of 2001. Jeff Bezos discusses this in this video:

 

 It is easy to hate Groupon right now. Anyone liking the company? 

 Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits.

Wednesday
Feb272013

Emotional Connection with Customers 

Eric Beder of Brean Capital wrote an interesting research report about American Apparel (APP). What caught my attention is his observation that despite the company almost collapsing in 2009-2010, its customers have never abandonned the company. He describes them as fanatically loyal and he labels the company one of the strongest brands in the consummer space.

The company has a strong emotional connection with its customers.

Now, let's look at Sears (SHLD) and JC Penney (JCP). Where are the fanatics? Nuf said.

Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits.

Tuesday
Jan292013

More Insights about Distressed Apparel Companies

Oscar Schafer, in this Barron's roundtable column, makes an interesting argument for Quicksilver the surfing and action sports apparel company. As a distressed investor, I bookmarked the following insights for future reference:

  • Global apparel brands with an authentic and rich heritage are very valuable. In a world of free and perfect information they are harder to build since it is becoming increasingly hard to gain potential customers attention.
  • The valuation needle can move to 10 to 15 times EBITDA for go private transactions.
  • These brands get in trouble when they lever up too much for acquisitions or other expansion gambles.  High levels of debt can be very risky.
  • The recovery catalyst for these situations revolves around a commitment  trimming the cost structure to allow operating earnings to reduce the debt load and interest expenses.

Our biggest position in distressed apparel is American Apparel (APP). We believe that when APP returns to optimal health, which should happen within two to three years, the company will generate 15% to 20% of sales in EBITDA at full capacity. At $800 million in revenues, the company could generate $120 million of EBITDA at a minimum. 

How much is that worth?

Investing in distressed situations is very risky.  Please do your own due dilligence prior to investing. We are long American Apparel and realize the odds of the company going bankrupt are still quite high.

Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits.

 

Friday
Jan252013

This Insight Made Billionaires

I found this interesting Pier Import ($PIR) article in Forbes magazine. The article highlights an interesting situation by which a distressed company start seeing his business getting much better while the stock prices is trading under the assumption of the worst case scenario. 
 
In November 2003, Pier 1's stock was trading above $25.  However, the housing crisis took a huge toll on sales and profitability.  By early 2009, $PIR dropped to just $0.10 and was in danger of delisting from the NYSE. Alex Smith, CEO of $PIR said this about this situation:
 
“The outside world couldn’t see it, but our business was getting stronger”
 
He was right.  Yesterday the stock closed at $21.85.
   
Trading large-caps can make you a few bucks, but finding deep value is where the big money is.  Anyone that can uncover situations like $PIR in 2009 can become a billionaire. People will pay you a lot for the ability to choose great deep value investments. I know I would. Wouldn't you?
 
Here are two more data points showing American Apparel's management confidence in the current state of the business. This is why I think American Apparel could be the next successful distressed situation:
 
 

Investing in distressed situations is very risky.  Please do your own due dilligence prior to investing. We are long American Apparel and realize the odds of the company going bankrupt are still quite high.

Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits.
Friday
Jan252013

Tablets to Fuel eBay and Amazon Marketplaces

ABI Research estimates that tablet shipments will reach 145 million in 2013. Since tablets can easily be re-set to factory default, packed and are cheap to ship, one would expect the trading in used tablets to explode in the next few years as users trade in the old for the new.

Assuming that the 2013 crop of tablets will change hand one time in their life at $100, the gross merchandise value (GMV) generated by this activity is $14.5 billion. That is only for a one year crop.

The beneficiaries of this trading activities are eBay ($EBAY) and Amazon.com ($AMZN) marketplaces. That is only one of the millions of products they both sell.

By my calculations that could mean 3-5% additional revenues with fat margin for EBAY and AMZN just from this one product. No wonder they are rocketing to all time highs. What do you think?

Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits.

Thursday
Sep132012

Time to Sell American Apparel?

I got a few direct messages asking if I was selling American Apparel ($APP) after its huge run up over the last few weeks. That is not the game I play. I like talking about my ideas with like minded investors but don't lean on me to make buying and selling decisions. You must do your homework. This is a distressed situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. Define the game you want to play and play it.
  
There is much more value in learning about processes than specific situations. In a nutshell here is the game I play.
  
I buy one distressed situation once about every 3 to 5 years. I can sit still for 5 years until I find something that suits my fancy. I am looking for distressed companies (brands) that are unique and have texture. Brands that are polarizing. Brands that people talk about for better or worse. I like them cheap and the further they fall from their apex the more excited I get. It is truly hard to keep a kick ass company on its ass for a long time.  The long-run earning power of the company by my own estimate should justify a 10 to 20 times recovery from depressed levels.
 
Sometimes the idea fails and the stock falls to zero. For that reason, I want to get paid in aggregate for taking distressed securities' risk.
 
When I am invested in a successful situation, I am patient.  I can and will wait years if I have to.  $APP is up a few percent, but that is peanuts compared to what I am looking to earn.  If anything, now is time to buy more, since each new data point that we get from the company seems to confirm our original bullish thesis.  This type of investment is about making the right decision based on the data, and it is not about making a few percent on momentum.
  
When I bought $CROX in 2008 and early 2009,  it was trading at about $1.  It was a risky situation, similar to $APP, but I had faith in the brand.  The stock rose 10%, then 20%, then 100%, to $2.  Did I sell?  No.  Now, nearly 4 years later it is trading at $17 and I am still long.  That is a 1700% return, and I am not ready to sell.
  
Below is a reprint (with permission) of @microfundy blog post that elaborates.
 

Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits

P.S. Please do your research before you trade the stock.  This is a highly risky situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The purpose of the post is to write down how I think about this and share it with you.  I am currently long APP.

  

Make sure you GET PAID!

 

Back in 2008, I contemplated investing in a liquor store. I discovered I would have needed to purchase a substantial amount of quantity in order to get the lowest prices on each kind of alcohol, resulting in a sizable initial investment to purchase the inventory. With such a large initial investment requirement (I estimated it at about half of a million dollars), one would think that margins on the business going forward would be relatively high. What I found was that the average gross margin (just revenues minus COGS) not even counting overhead)) was around 5-10%. I did not make the investment.

 

Thinking about it years later, it makes total sense. A grocery store’s food can spoil. A restaurant has so many moving parts (wait staff, chefs, tons of ingredients to purchase). etc. The risks to those businesses are so much higher. How much can go wrong in a liquor business? Products don’t (typically) spoil. There aren’t so many SKUs. It’s an extremely “clean” business model, easy to mange = not as many risks. The profits “needed” to make it worthwhile – to compensate for the risks taken – do not need to be so high.

 

I learnt a valuable lesson from this, which I apply to my investments all the time. For every risk an investment has, the investment should have the ability to earn you a higher return when compared to an equivalent investment ex that risk.

You need to be compensated for the risks that you are taking.

 

So while I focused on the “after the fact” in last week’s post titled Hindsight is always 20/20, the same holds true when initiating an investment.

 

Look at APP… @biggercapital has been talking about it a lot recently on his blog. Their CEO is a risk. The company’s balance sheet is a tremendous risk. Even with their recent capital infusion, their ability to finance future operations will be a challenge. For these risk, (and many more that I’m sure they have) you should be awarded a higher return.

 

Is it a wise investment at this stage? I don’t know. One thing I am sure of however, is that if you are buying it to make a 10% or 20% return, you are making a huge mistake. You should a have much higher hurdle rate – a required minimum return – to invest in a situation like that. (Michael Bigger has mentioned many times in the past that he’s looking for well over a 100% return on it (& he has had a good record with other apparel companies in similar situations. See CROX))

 

So whether you own or plan on buying APP or a similar company, make sure you’re properly playing the odds.

Make sure you GET PAID!

 

- MicroFundy

Friday
Aug242012

My Wife Said Either Dov Charney is Nuts or...

I showed my wife two videos about American Apparel.

The first one is about "Rick Klotz and Dov Charney recently afforded Highsnobiety TV the exclusive opportunity to sit down and discuss the full background story behind the Warriors of Radness and American Apparel partnership."

 

 

The second one is about Matilda dancing at American Apparel's brand new distribution center in Los Angeles, California.

 

 

After watching both videos my wife said: strange since most companies in distressed situations focus on cash management and not growth initiatives. Either Dov Charney is nuts, or your are 100% correct on your thesis. Or maybe both of you are nuts.

Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits

P.S. Please do your research before you trade the stock.  This is a highly risky situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The purpose of the post is to write down how I think about this and share it with you.  I am currently long APP.

Monday
Aug202012

American Apparel Surfing a Growth Wave

Source: American Apparel Website.On March 14, 2012 American Apparel released the following guidance for fiscal 2012 results:
 

Initial 2012 Outlook

For 2012, the Company is initially projecting adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $32 million to $40 million. The outlook assumes net sales between $552 million and $559 million and a gross profit rate between 54.5% and 55.8%.  Raw material costs are estimated at current prices and foreign currency exchange rates are estimated to remain at current levels. Capital expenditures are estimated at $15.9 million for the year with a modest number of new store openings.

The company's outlook assumes a sales growth rate of about 2%
 
Management Upgrades EBITDA forecast in August 2012.
 
The Company is raising its adjusted EBITDA guidance for 2012 to between $36 to $44 million from the prior estimate of $32 to $40 million.
 
For the month of August, the Company expects that comparable store sales will increase in the upper teen to low twenty percent range.
   
Twenty percent, you heard that right! And that is not all...
 
The process to build a new distribution center infrastructure is underway and will improve the speed and accuracy of shipments to stores and will also significantly reduce operating expenses. Completion of this project is expected by early 2013.

This information combined with the fact that the company is starting to open stores aggressively tells me that management is confident that growth will persist and that operation must be improved and expanded in order to increase capacity to meet demand.  The company must also be confident that it can refinance its Lion loan at a lower interest rate in the near future, as they have discussed. 

Here are the results to date in 2012. We are including a normalized growth rate (last line) which account for stores closure.
 
 
With comp sales accelerating to about 20%,  store counts growing at about 4% per annum and accelerating,  we're thinking that American Apparel could generate revenues closer to $625mm in 2012 and beat its EBITDA forecast by +10 million.
  
We believe the company could be operating at full capacity on a forward looking 12 months basis in June of 2013 with EBITDA power of about $120mm (15% of sales).
  
American Apparel is currently riding a massive growth wave. It either rides it and its stock responds to the massive growth in EBITDA or it wipes out (sales slow down for some unexpected reasons) and the company declares bankruptcy. This is do or die for American Apparel.
 
What do you think?
 

Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits

P.S. Please do your research before you trade the stock.  This is a highly risky situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The purpose of the post is to write down how I think about this and share it with you.  I am currently long APP.

Tuesday
Jun192012

How Is American Apparel Performing Against Original 2012 Guidance?

On March 14, 2012 American Apparel released the following guidance for fiscal 2012 results:
 

Initial 2012 Outlook

For 2012, the Company is initially projecting adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $32 million to $40 million. The outlook assumes net sales between $552 million and $559 million and a gross profit rate between 54.5% and 55.8%.  Raw material costs are estimated at current prices and foreign currency exchange rates are estimated to remain at current levels. Capital expenditures are estimated at $15.9 million for the year with a modest number of new store openings.

The company's outlook assumes a sales growth rate of about 2%. Here are the results to date in 2012. We are including a normalized growth rate (last line) which account for stores closure.

 
With sales growth rates closer to +15% on an adjusted basis and with the impact of store closures waning in August, we're thinking that American Apparel could beat its EBITDA forecast by a wide margin.
 
What do you think?
 

Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits

P.S. Please do your research before you trade the stock.  This is a highly risky situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The purpose of the post is to write down how I think about this and share it with you.  I am currently long APP.

Monday
May142012

American Apparel Thesis Blossoming

On May 6 2011, we wrote our initial post about American Apparel ($APP). It is hard to believe that we have worked on this situation for more than one year already. Investing in distressed situations requires a fair amount of patience. The process by which the original thesis is tested against actual results evolves over a few years time frame; the investment growing in size as the results back up the original thesis.

We have been following every single move of the largest investor that invested capital in the company back in April of 2011. The big elephant in this deal was not Serruya but GCIC through its Dynamic Power Hedge Fund. GCIC has owned more than the 13-G filing requirement since the deal was executed. 

GCIC owned 7,381,607 common shares (7.49% undiluted) as of June 30, 2011. In its latest 13G filing GCIC disclosed that it owned 20,005,216 common shares (18.38% undiluted) as of March 31, 2012.

In April 2011, Michael Serruya, representing the investor group, had this to say about the original deal:

"We believe in the American Apparel brand and we believe in Dov Charney," Mr. Serruya said. "We are convinced that with adequate resources, Dov and his experienced management team will lead American Apparel to new heights."

The actions of GCIC indicate that it continues to believe in the original thesis, and that the company might very well elevate to new heights. The first quarter of 2012 results indicate that this is becoming a higher probability situation.

Makes sense?

Written by Michael Bigger. Follow me on Twitter and StockTwits

P.S. Don't go out and buy the stock. This is a highly distressed situation and it is not suitable for the majority of investors. The purpose of the post is to write down how I think about this and share it with you.